第一單元︰架構︰行動
UNIT I: The Framework: Taking Action.
步驟參照規劃實踐七步模型
The steps refer to the Seven Step Model of Planning Practice.
第一步︰定義問題
Step1: Define the Problem.
Webber and Rittel，＜一般規劃理論的兩難選擇＞於《政治科學》， 4, no.2 (1973): 第155-169頁
Webber and Rittel. "Dilemmas in a general theory of planning." Policy Sciences 4, no.2 (1973): pp. 155-169.
Gans，＜公民與規劃︰城市問題及解決方案的論文＞於《消滅城市貧窮的社會和實體規劃》 第16章，紐約，基本圖書公司, 1968，第231-248頁
Gans. “People and Plans: Essays on Urban Problems and Solutions.” Chapter 16 in Social and Physical Planning for the Elimination of Urban Poverty. New York: Basic Books Inc., 1968, pp. 231-248.
第二步︰界定資金擁有者的利益
Step 2: Map Stakeholder Interests.
Meyerson and Banfield，＜政治，規劃與公共利益＞於《概念性規劃的記錄》，倫敦: Collier-Macmillan, 1964，第303-329頁
Meyerson and Banfield. “Politics, Planning and the Public Interest.” Note on Conceptual Scheme. London: Collier-Macmillan, 1964, pp. 303-329.
第三步︰分析變革的制度阻力與壓力
Step 3: Analyze Institutional Resistance and Pressures for Reform.
Krumholz，＜1969-1979公正規劃回顧＞於《美國規劃協會期刊》48 (1982)：第163-174頁
Krumholz. "A retrospective view of equity planning 1969-1979." Journal of the American Planning Association 48 (1982): pp. 163-174.
Jacobs，＜美國大城市的死與生＞，紐約：蘭等出版社，1961，第415-427頁
Jacobs. “Death and Life of Great American Cities.” New York, NY: Random House, 1961, pp. 415-427.
Friedmann＜公共領域的規劃：論述與實踐＞於《規劃教育與研究期刊》8 (1989)：第128-130頁
Friedmann. "Planning in the Public Domain: discourse and praxis." Journal of Planning Education and Research 8 (1989): pp. 128-130.
第四步：接觸資金擁有者
Step 4: Engage the Stakeholders.
Davidoff, Paul，＜規劃中的倡導與多元性＞於《美國規劃者協會期刊》31 (1965)：第103-114頁
Davidoff, Paul. "Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning." Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31 (1965): pp. 103-114.
Peattie，＜反思倡導規劃＞於《美國規劃者協會期刊》34, no. 2 (1968)：第80-88頁
Peattie. "Reflections on Advocacy Planning." Journal of the American Institute of Planners 34, no. 2 (1968): pp. 80-88.
Hartman，＜榮辱之間：基礎城市規劃四十年＞於《城市領域服務計畫》.紐約，Brunswick, NJ: 城市政策研究中心，2002，第367-374頁
Hartman. “Between Eminence And Notoriety: Four Decades Of Radical Urban Planning.” The Urban Field Service Program. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, 2002, pp. 367-374.
Abrams，＜人們在城市化世界中尋求庇陰的抗爭＞於《若干城市就援原則》，，Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1964，第250-252頁
Abrams. “Man's Struggle for Shelter in an Urbanizing World.” Some principles for urban aid. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1964, pp. 250-252.
第五步︰尋求行動的一致
Step 5: Seek Agreement On What Needs To Be Done.
Kent，＜城市總體規劃＞，舊金山，加利福尼亞: Chandler, 1964, [第一章，第12- 26頁，第二章，第66-73頁、第80-86頁].
Kent. “The Urban General Plan.” San Francisco, CA: Chandler, 1964, [Chapter 1, pp. 12- 26, Chapter 2, pp. 66-73, pp. 80-86].
Altshuler，＜城市規劃過程：政治分析＞Ithaca, 紐約：康乃爾大學出版社, 1969, [第299-304頁、第311-332頁].
Altshuler. “The City Planning Process: a Political Analysis.” Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1969, [pp. 299-304, pp. 311-332].
第六步︰執行政策、計畫和程序的改變
Step 6: Implement Changes in Policies, Programs and Procedures.
Lindblom＜應付的科學＞於《公共管理評論》19 (1959)：第79-88頁
Lindblom. "The Science of Muddling Through." Public Administration Review 19 (1959): pp. 79-88.
Wildavsky，＜如果規劃包羅萬象，很可能空無一物＞於《政策科學》4 (2) (1973)：第127-153頁
Wildavsky. "If Planning is everything, Maybe it is Nothing." Policy Sciences 4 (2) (1973): pp. 127-153.
Caro，＜政客：羅伯特、摩西和紐約的秋天＞，Alfred A. Knopf編輯，紐約, 1974, [第368-379頁與第850-884頁].
Caro. “The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York.” Edited by Alfred A. Knopf. New York, NY, 1974, [pp. 368-379, and pp. 850-884].
第七步︰反省，鼓勵公眾學習，評估
Step 7: Reflect, Encourage Public Learning, Make Assessments.
Schon，＜沈思的從業者：專業人員在行動中的思考模式＞，紐約: Basic圖書公司., 1982, [第2章第21-69頁，第7章第204-235頁].
Schon. “The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.” New York, NY: Basic Books Inc., 1982, [Chapter 2, pp. 21-69, Chapter 7, pp. 204-235].
第二單元 波士頓
UNIT II: Boston.
＜波斯頓的總體規劃：1950年初步報告＞，1950，第3、7、8頁
“General Plan for Boston: Preliminary Report 1950.” 1950, pp. 3, 7, 8.
Kennedy，＜山城規劃＞，Amherst, 藝術碩士: 麻省大學出版社, 1992. [雞尾酒、談話與新波士頓，第157-192頁].
Kennedy. “Planning the City Upon a Hill.” Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 1992. [Collins, Logue, and the New Boston, pp. 157-192].
Keyes，＜修復規劃競賽：鄰里關係多樣性的研究＞，Cambridge, 文學碩士:麻省理工學院出版社, 1969, [第1章，第1-19與第67-87頁].
Keyes. “The Rehabilitation Planning Game: A Study in the Diversity of Neighborhood.” Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969, [Chapter One pp. 1-19, and pp. 67-87].
Keyes，＜波士頓南端的城市更新：案例學習－1965/75波士頓和區域核心的總體規劃＞於《總體規劃的作用和本質》第I章第1-4頁，和《波士頓實體資產和問題》第II章（1998）第7-30頁
Keyes. “Urban Renewal in Boston's South End: Case Study 1965/75 General Plan for the City of Boston and the Regional Core.” The Role and Nature of the General Plan in Chapter I, pp. 1-4 and Boston's Physical Assets and Problems in Chapter II (1998), pp. 7-30.
第三單元︰墨西哥
UNIT III: Mexico.
英語和西班牙語網頁文章的選擇
Selection of web articles in English and Spanish.
Ward，＜墨西哥城＞，Lincoln, MA: G.K. Hall and Co, 1990，第128-134頁
Ward. "Mexico City." Lincoln, MA: G.K. Hall and Co, 1990, pp.128-134.
Davis，＜墨西哥城：民主化的區域國家動力學＞於《拉美首府政治：民主化和授權參與》Dietz與Meyers.編輯，Lynne Rienner: Boulder, CO, 2002，第241-259頁
Davis. “Mexico City: The Local-National Dynamics of Democratization.” In Capital City Politics in Latin America: Democratization and Empowerment. Edited by Dietz and Meyers. Lynne Rienner: Boulder, CO, 2002, pp. 241-259.
Ward and Rodriguez，＜墨西哥新聯邦制度與州立政府＞於《美國－墨西哥報告》，#9, LBJ 公共事務學校，奧斯汀，德州：德州大學, 1999, [第1-4頁；第21-39頁；第65-95頁；第98-126頁].
Ward and Rodriguez. “New Federalism and State Government in Mexico.” U.S.-Mexico Policy Report #9, LBJ School of Public Affairs, Austin, TX: University of Texas, 1999, [pp. 1-4; pp. 21-39; pp. 65-95; pp. 98-126].
Schteingart，＜墨西哥城＞於《都市時代第二卷：巨型城市》，Dogan 與Kasarda. Newbury Park編輯，CA: Sage 出版社, 1988，第268-293頁
Schteingart. “Mexico City.” In The Metropolitan Era Volume 2: Mega-Cities. Edited by Dogan and Kasarda. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1988, pp. 268-293.
Rosan, and Davis, Christina，＜�筱o Al Aeropuerto en Texcoco！區域決策與社區反動員：墨西哥城新機場的選址＞，都市規畫之碩士論文，麻省理工學院城市研究與規劃系, 2002.
Rosan, and Davis, Christina. “¡No Al Aeropuerto en Texcoco! Regional Decision-Making and Community Counter mobilization: The Siting of Mexico City’s New Airport.” Masters in City Planning Thesis, submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning: MIT, 2002.
第四單元︰鹿特丹
UNIT IV: Rotterdam.
＜交叉組織者2000的邊界＞，於《邊境故事︰阿姆斯特丹邊境發生了什麼》，NL: Agora Europa.
“Borders to Cross Organisers 2000.” The Border Story: What Happened at Borders to Cross. Amsterdam, NL: Agora Europa.
Schön. “，＜調查的理論︰杜威關於教育的遺贈＞於《課程調查》，22, no.2 (1992).
Schön. “The Theory of Inquiry: Dewey’s Legacy to Education.” Curriculum Inquiry 22, no.2 (1992).
Evans，更多宜居城市的政治策略＞於《宜居城市︰城市為宜居和可持續性發展的奮鬥》，Evans編輯，巴爾克利，加州大學出版社, 2002，第222-246頁
Evans. “Political Strategies for More Livable Cities.” Livable Cities: Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainability. Edited by Evans. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002, pp. 222-246.
《變革中的城市》，Graafland and Hauptman. Rotterdam編輯: 010, 2001.
Cities in Transition. Edited by Graafland and Hauptman. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2001.
- Graafland，＜導論：變革中的城市＞[第30-35頁].
- Graafland. “Introduction: Cities in Transition.” [pp. 30-35].
- de Bruijn，＜鹿特丹港口︰鹿特丹城市與港口的融合＞[第70-80頁].
- de Bruijn. “The Port of Rotterdam: Synthesis between Rotterdam City and Mainport.” [pp. 70-80].
- Maas，＜計畫︰港口城市，1999年＞[第122-127頁].
- Maas. “Project: Port City, 1999.” [pp. 122-127].
- Meyer，＜作為公共領域的港口＞[第160-167頁].
- Meyer. “The Port as Public Domain.” [p. 160-167].
- Brusse. “海堤之後的混亂︰採訪Dirk Frieling＞[第378-386頁].
- Brusse. “Chaos behind the Sea Wall: Interview with Dirk Frieling.” [pp. 378-386].
- Priemus，＜荷蘭最近城市政策的改變＞[第388-403頁].
- Priemus. “Recent Transformations in Urban Policies in the Netherlands.” [pp. 388-403].
《都市讀者》，LeGates與Stout 編輯，英國倫敦: Routledge, 1996.
The City Reader. Edited by LeGates and Stout. London, UK: Routledge, 1996.
- Sassen，＜新的邊緣和中心地理︰概要和應用＞，於《世界經濟中的城市》(1994): pp. 69- 74.
- Sassen. “A new geography of centers and margins: summary and implications.” Cities in a World Economy (1994): pp. 69- 74.
- Castells，＜空間潮流中社會含意的重建＞於《訊息城市》(1989)：第493-498頁.
- Castells. “The reconstruction of social meaning in the space of flows.” The Informational City (1989): pp. 493-498.
Healy，＜合作規劃︰塑造碎片社會中的成片場所＞於《規劃理念之傳統》第一章. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, 1997，第7-30頁.
Healy. “Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies.” Chapter 1 of Traditions of Planning Thought. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, 1997, pp.7-30.
Laws, Susskind, Anderson, Chapman, Rubenstein and Vagadama，＜大眾企業家網路＞於《環境技術與公共政策計畫》，麻省理工學院城市研究與規劃系(2001).
Laws, Susskind, Anderson, Chapman, Rubenstein and Vagadama. “Public Entrepreneurship Networks.” Environmental Technology and Public Policy Program. Department of Urban Studies and Planning, MIT (2001).
第五單元
UNIT V
Guttenberg，＜美國規劃史上的重要事件＞於《規劃教育與研究期刊》7, no. 1 (1987).
Guttenberg. “Some important facts in the history of American planning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 7, no. 1 (1987).
Rodwin and Sanyal，＜都市規劃業︰變化、想像和挑戰︰1950-2000＞New Brunswick, NJ: 城市政策研究中心 (2000).
Rodwin and Sanyal. “The Profession of City Planning: Changes, Images and Challenges: 1950-2000.” New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research (2000).
